Comments on: I need your vote URGENTLY http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/ Keyword Research and SEO Explained for the Rest of Us Mon, 23 May 2011 19:22:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Kent - Designarts http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-67 Kent - Designarts Fri, 16 May 2008 15:31:48 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-67 It makes good sense to offer both techniques which furthers your authority and insight to those seeking knowledge at your site. Better yet, show the new version with a link to a new page that explains the criteria and comparison to both. Kent It makes good sense to offer both techniques which furthers your authority and insight to those seeking knowledge at your site. Better yet, show the new version with a link to a new page that explains the criteria and comparison to both.

Kent

]]> By: Kathy Robinson http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-66 Kathy Robinson Fri, 16 May 2008 10:23:34 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-66 I agree with many of the above comments - both ways if possible, if not, then the new way. Kathy I agree with many of the above comments – both ways if possible, if not, then the new way.

Kathy

]]> By: tammy http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-65 tammy Fri, 01 Sep 2006 04:42:39 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-65 If at all possible, both ways would be great. If at all possible, both ways would be great.

]]> By: paul http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-64 paul Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:36:42 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-64 Haven't used nichebot much over recent times but surely the old and new could both be shown? If not then the new way might be best, and we can do a manuel comparison ourselves Just a thought Paul Haven’t used nichebot much over recent times but surely the
old and new could both be shown? If not then the new way might be best, and we can do a manuel comparison ourselves
Just a thought

Paul

]]> By: John Diffenthal http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-63 John Diffenthal Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:54:32 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-63 Whatever approach you use will be defective to a degree. There is no perfect mechanism for delivering the exact number of competitors. Your new approach is clearly an improvement but no doubt you will refine it again in the future. It will rarely be a problem for people using Nichebot since I'm sure that most people use it for static (rather than time-series) analysis. Whatever approach you use will be defective to a degree. There is no perfect mechanism for delivering the exact number of competitors. Your new approach is clearly an improvement but no doubt you will refine it again in the future. It will rarely be a problem for people using Nichebot since I’m sure that most people use it for static (rather than time-series) analysis.

]]> By: Sam http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-62 Sam Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:00:44 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-62 The optimized results count gives the wrong impression that competion is much less that actual. If Google was following the same criteria to rank its search results it would have been great, but it does not. The narrow selection of pages that show up in the intitle, inachor search do not make it high in google's actual search. The optimized results count gives the wrong impression that competion is much less that actual. If Google was following the same criteria to rank its search results it would have been great, but it does not.

The narrow selection of pages that show up in the intitle, inachor search do not make it high in google’s actual search.

]]> By: Ruth http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-61 Ruth Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:11:47 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-61 Thanks for a great job. Thanks for a great job.

]]> By: Colleen Redman http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-60 Colleen Redman Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:47:54 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-60 I like it the way it is now. I like it the way it is now.

]]> By: Scott http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-59 Scott Sun, 27 Aug 2006 05:09:22 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-59 TRULY optimized for a keyword TRULY optimized for a keyword

]]> By: theGypsy http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/comment-page-1/#comment-58 theGypsy Sun, 27 Aug 2006 03:53:18 +0000 http://www.nichebot.com/blog/25/25/#comment-58 You know.. I am a really, really, really busy SEO guy. To the point I give out advice because I cannot take on new clients. That’s right, I give it away. That’s what this is. Anyway, I totally agree with finding more appropriate ways of calculating a more accurate ‘competition’ factor. Merely looking at the BULK results is a non-indicator for true competitive analysis. This new move shows an understanding of this systemic problem. Few others have PUBLICALLY addressed this issue. I must say this improvement gives nicheBot a leg up in the world on Keyword Competitive Analysis. As a professional I will be looking closely. ..and the price? Truly a gift. IMHO David Harry You know.. I am a really, really, really busy SEO guy. To the point I give out advice because I cannot take on new clients. That’s right, I give it away.

That’s what this is.

Anyway, I totally agree with finding more appropriate ways of calculating a more accurate ‘competition’ factor. Merely looking at the BULK results is a non-indicator for true competitive analysis.
This new move shows an understanding of this systemic problem. Few others have PUBLICALLY addressed this issue.

I must say this improvement gives nicheBot a leg up in the world on Keyword Competitive Analysis. As a professional I will be looking closely.

..and the price? Truly a gift.

IMHO

David Harry

]]>