Friday, March 12th, 2010

News Feed Comments

You are here: Home / adsense / Duplicate Content just became a thing of the past!

Duplicate Content just became a thing of the past!

Comments

Earlier this morning (2:15 a.m. to be precise), I wrote you an email about zapping duplicate content with a 14-second solution and introducing you to David Watson over in the UK.

http://www.nichebot.com/new-content/

Dave’s got a really thick English accent, but his 9 minute and 52 second video is powerful. Just one pass through and your jaw will drop to the ground just like mine did.

Why?

First of all, Dave cleared $177,307.51 last year from Google Adsense while avoiding the duplicate content problem altogether. He shows you how he did this in his video.

And I give him some serious kudos because he outdid my own Google Adsense income in 2005 by $59,061.36 as you can see from my 1099 from Google below.

Jim's 1099 from Google

If you are a webmaster or online business owner that relies on Google Adsense as a part of your overall revenue, then there’s a good chance you are relying on monetizing “content” in your portfolio of websites.

And if you are in any way using material (articles, content, stories, etc.) that can be found on other websites, then there’s a very likely chance that Google has dropped your rankings for those pages into supplemental results that no one even sees, or those pages will soon be cited for “duplicate content.”

Do not wait for this to happen!!!

Even if you are using those Private Label Rights articles from article membership sites, there’s a good chance someone else may be using the same article on their website, without modifying it. Again, duplicate content.

The best thing to always do is re-write the article and always make any content you post to your website completely unique to your own website, making certain it can be found NOWHERE else on the Internet. I always teach and highly recommend to inject your own personality into the re-write of any Private Label Rights content that you have rights to.

The fact is — writing does not come natural to most people, so then the problem becomes — who is going to re-write your content and re-write your articles?

Now, over the past number of months, there have been a number of software applications that have come out that claim to spin your article or content without having to re-write a single word. Great for the lazy person, right? WRONG!

I have examined these software applications (one after another) and it can take WELL OVER 45 minutes to 1 hour of your time to re-write one single article. The reason being is because you have to actually hand seed the document with hotspots of where you want to replace words and so on. Which is why you’ve never heard a thing from me about any of them. Quite frankly, because they all took too much of your time.

That is, until I saw what Dave’s got.

Quite frankly, this is THE kind of tool I’ve been waiting for someone to come out with and it’s finally here. When I say it’s the 14-second solution, it IS the 14-second solution.

See it right before your own eyes as Dave spins 1 article into…. well, you’ll see once you watch the video…

http://www.nichebot.com/new-content/

Dave has allowed NicheBOT subscribers to take a look before he even launches his brand new product tomorrow called Website Content Wizard. And we’ve arranged an instant $30 discount that expires within the next 6 hours, UK time.

I urge you to take a look at what Dave’s got or at least watch his 9 minute and 52 second video that shows you how powerful his 14-second solution is.

http://www.nichebot.com/new-content/

Be on the lookout within the next 48 hours for the release of the next lot of 1,000 NicheBOT 2 Beta accounts.

Until next time.

Best,

Jim Morris, President/CEO

Full Throttle Enterprises, Inc.

NicheBOT – “Finds exactly what people search for.”

Posted by The NicheBOT Guy on Thursday, August 31, 2006 at 1:22 pm 
Filed under adsense, adsense revenue, google adsense · Tagged with

  • Jim is right. I understand that it was a tad misleading. People would expect articles to come out in 14 seconds but that would be naive to think there was no prep work involved. Unfortunately many people haven't experienced just ho wpowerful in the long run this can be. That is a shame.

    However, I have gotten many people so far, in under a month, to blow the dust off of Website Content Wizard they just gave up on and let gather dust. They have thanked me and are very happy with my book and package for it called Website content Apprentice. At first it was available to only new people who bought Website Content Wizard but now I am making it available to old customers too.

    Jim is right, it must be trained the right way to get the proper results. But I stress the "right" way. There are plenty of ways to get it wrong and have it output garbage. It's not going to work out of the box, no, but after doing a couple of articles you can actually generate 100s.
  • Vivian,


    I appreciate your comments.


    However, what you are expecting is literally Artificial Intelligence to have a device literally think for you.


    I can certainly guarantee you that such a device would most likely cost you THOUSANDS and would probably not be available to the general public.


    This is much like the filter in my email program. It did not come trained -- I had to train it.


    The more I use it, the better it gets at detecting spam.


    Plus, you certainly would not want the software program to come with DECISIONS already made for you. The developer or anyone else for that matter does not think like you, so that's the thing.


    You must train IT (Website Content Wizard) to think like YOU and only YOU so it can begin to understand how YOU think.


    That's the whole entire purpose of starting with a clean slate.


    Just like any software program that takes time to use and get accustomed to, you need to break it in, figure out the controls and options and customize to tailor your own needs.


    Make sense?


    Anywho -- I hope you enjoy Website Content Wizard like I do and get much use out it.


    Best of success,


    Jim Morris, President/CEO
    Full Throttle Enterprises, Inc.
    NicheBOT - "Finds exactly what people search for."
  • Vivian
    I rate this better than articlebot, but it is not fast. The 14 second video is deceiving. First of all let me say that I did buy the tool a few days ago and have played with it long enough. The 14 second video happens only after one has spent time going word by word through a PLR and selecting words from the built in thesaurus. No matter how you cut it, this takes time. 45 minutes is at least what it takes. Only after you have done lots of articles and trained the software will it 'spin' on automatic, getting alternate word choices for words. And, again, this would take lots of articles to build such a base. I have to say I am disappointed about this time factor, as I got the software on the basis it would automatically put out a 100 article in 14 seconds. I learned that one must first hand select thesaurus alternative for EACH word, and go through a two-step process to train the software to build enough words to do a fairly decent automatic replacement.

    Also, while the power of the software lies in the usage of text blocks interspersed with data feed, again, it takes time to compile any kind of original data feed. I have been taking 4 days now to put together a datafeed in excel, and that sucks. Also, while you can dash out several blocks, you must then go one by one through enough words in your blocks so they have several thesaurus alternatives. Then you can have these blocks spun into different varieties.

    So hell no, this is no 14 second tool, but an easier version of articlebot, improved as far as ease, but it still takes at least 45 minutes or more per article. Once you have slaved to get one article worked, then you can get 100 versions in less than 14 seconds.

    The tool has its merits, but it takes the same amount of time to rework each article, even though it is easier to get an output than articlebot, which I also have used.
blog comments powered by Disqus